Which Internal Factors Drive Companies to Social Reporting? An Empirical Study from A Developing Country Perspective
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Research Aim: This study examines the influence of firms’ internal factors and the impact of a statutory regulatory order on the extent of corporate social reporting by banking firms in Bangladesh in the period from 2011 to 2015.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Besides using content analysis to construct a social disclosure index, multivariate regression analysis was performed to test a number of hypotheses related to the key variables of the study.
Research Findings: The descriptive statistics of the social reporting disclosure index do not show a notable impact of the statutory regulatory order on the extent of firms’ social reporting. The study found that board meetings and board expertise have a significant positive impact on firms’ social reporting, while firm size is negatively associated with firms’ social reporting; thus, meaning that comparatively smaller firms perform better in terms of social reporting. However, no significant impact is found for board size and firm network on firms’ social reporting.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: The study has contributed theoretical aspects about firms’ different internal factors and, particularly, how legal arrangements like SRO can be applied by the government to motivate a firm to undertake corporate social activities and disclosures. The application of resource dependence theory to CSR has been further fortified with this investigative study.
Practitioner/Policy Implication: The empirical result implies that as CSR is practiced voluntarily in Bangladesh, such policies of government like tax exemption on CSR expenditure has not had much of an impact.
Research Limitation: This study can be investigated with multi-industry data to further explore industry variations, but, due to poor and inconsistent CSR reporting of other industries in Bangladesh, only listed firms in the banking industry have been included to obtain appropriate results and findings.
Type of Manuscript: Research Paper.
Keywords: Corporate Social Reporting, Internal Factors, Regulatory Impact, Banking Industry.
JEL Classification: M14
Downloads
Article Details
License
The Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives (AJAP) articles are published under a licence equivalent to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (CC BY-NC-ND). The licence allows users to copy, distribute, and transmit an article as long as the author is attributed. The article is not used for commercial purposes. The work is not modified or adapted in any way.
Copyright
Authors are required to sign the Exclusive License to Publish agreement upon publication in the AJAP. The agreement grants the Publisher (Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Universiti Malaya) to publish and disseminate the articles.
Open Access
Articles published in the AJAP are digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions.
Article Processing Charge
Articles publish in AJAP is free submission, production and publication charges. However, all accepted articles are required for language editing. The AJAP officially appointed and outsourced proofreader will conduct this process, and the authors will cover the cost. AJAP does not profit from this process and transaction.
References
Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147-158.
Azim, M. I., Ahmed, S., & Islam, S. (2009). Corporate Social Reporting Practice: Evidence from Listed Companies in Bangladesh. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 10, 130-145.
Belal, A. R. (2001). A study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16, 274–289.
Belal, A. R., & D. L. Owen. (2007). The View of Corporate Managers on the Current State of, and Future Prospects for Social Reporting in Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 472-494.
Chen, C., & Jaggi, B. (2000). Association between Independent Non-Executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19, 285-31.
Chui, T. & Wang, Y. (2015). Determinants of Social Disclosure Quality in Taiwan: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 379-398.
Das, S., Dixon, R., & Micheal, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: A Longitudinal Study of Listed Banking Companies in Bangladesh. World Review of Business Research, 5(1), 130-154.
Davis, G. F. & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource Dependence Theory: Past and Future. Newyork: NY, Emerald group Publishing, 21-42.
Deegan, Craig. (2002). Introduction the Legitimizing Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures - A Theoretical Foundation, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3),282- 3l l.
Esa, E., & Zahari, A. R. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: Ownership structures, Board Characteristics and the Mediating Role of Board Compensation, presented at 7th International Economics and Business Management Conference, Pahang, Malaysia, 5th & 6th October, 2015. Elsevier B.V.
Glanchant, J. (2002). Why regulate Deregulated Network Industries? Completion and Regulation in Network Industries, 3(3), 297-311.
Gray, R. (2001). Thirty Years of Social Accounting, Reporting and Auditing: What (If Anything) Have We Learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 9-15.
Gray, R. H., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. 2001. Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28, 327-356.
Habek, P., & Wolniak, R. (2015). Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Quality and Quantity, 2, 399-420.
Habek, P., & Wolniak, R. (2015). Factors Influencing the Development of CSR Reporting Practices: Experts’ versus Preparers’ Points of View. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 26(5), 560–570.
Hamid, F. Z. A. (2004). Corporate Social Disclosure by Banks and Financial Companies Malaysian Evidence. Corporate Ownership and Control, 1(4), 118-130.
Hermalin, B. E., & Michael, S. W. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9, 7-26.
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource Dependence Theory: A Review. Journal of Management, 35 (6), 1404-1427.
Hossain, D. M., Khan, A. R., & Yasmin, I. (2004). The Nature of Voluntary Disclosures on Human Resource in the Annual Reports of Bangladeshi Companies. Dhaka University Journal of Business Studies, 25(1), 221-231.
Hossain, M., Islam, K., & Andrew, J. (2006). Corporate social and environmental disclosure in developing countries: Evidence from Bangladesh. working paper. Sydney, Australia: University of Wollongong, Faculty of Commerce.
Imam, S. (2000). Corporate social performance reporting in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15, 133-141.
Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2013). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the US banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601-615,
Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The Integration of Corporate Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 150-26.
Kor, Y. Y., & Misangyi, V. F. 2008. Outside directors’ industry-specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1345-1355.
Krasodomska, J. (2015). CSR disclosures in the banking industry. Empirical evidence from Poland. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(3), 406-423.
Naser, K., & Hassan, Y. (2013). Determinants of corporate social responsibility reporting: evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business Research, 2(3), 56-73.
Owen, D. L. (2005). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: the missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 649-67.
Parsa, S., & Kouhy, R. (2008). Social Reporting by Companies Listed on the Alternative Investment Market. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 345-360.
Paul, K., Cobas, E., Ceron, R., Frithiof, M., Maass, A., Navarro, I., & Deaton, L. Z. (2006). Corporate social reporting in Mexico. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2006(22), 67-80.
Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366.
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting, Organization and Society, 17, 595-612.
Sarker, A. A. (2000). Regulation of Islamic banking in Bangladesh: Role of Bangladesh Bank. International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 2(1), 45-56.
Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P., & Collin, S. (2009). What Explains the Extent and Content of Social and Environmental Disclosures on Corporate Websites: A Study of Social and Environmental Reporting in Swedish-Listed Corporations? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(6), 352-364.
Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3), 255-277.
Wu, M. & Chung-Hua S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 3529–354.