https://sare.um.edu.my/index.php/IJCS/issue/feed INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHINA STUDIES 2025-06-04T15:53:56+08:00 Journal Manager of IJCS chinastudies@um.edu.my Open Journal Systems <p>The International Journal of China Studies is a biannual academic journal focusing on contemporary China in issues pertaining to the fields of political, social and economic development, trade and commerce, foreign relations, regional security and other domains of the social sciences in the context of, more specifically, today’s Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong or Macau. The journal is abstracted/indexed in Scopus, International Political Science Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Bibliography of Asian Studies, EconLit, eJEL, JEL on CD, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, Ulrichsweb Global Serials Directory, Reference Corporation’s Asia-Pacific Database, ProQuest Political Science and Research Library, ABI/INFORM Complete, ABI/INFORM Global, PAIS (Public Affairs Information Service) International, CSA (formerly Cambridge Scientific Abstracts) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts and NLB’s ISI (Index to Singapore Information).</p> <p>ISSN : 2180-3250<br />Publisher : Institute of China Studies, Universiti Malaya<br />Publication Type : Online<br />Publication frequency: 2 time(s) per year (June and December) <br />Peer Review : Double Blind</p> https://sare.um.edu.my/index.php/IJCS/article/view/61778 Australia in the Region: Dialogue, Transparency and Trust 2025-06-04T15:36:02+08:00 Danielle HEINICKE internationaleducation@dfat.gov.au <p>A decade or two ago, readers may have wondered why the Australian High Commissioner to Malaysia would write an introduction to an edition of the International Journal of China Studies. But our region has changed rapidly since then and Australia’s place in and vision for the region has changed along with it.<br>Today, Australia recognises that having a deep understanding of our region matters. And more than ever, it matters how we work with regional partners, including China, to shape a peaceful, prosperous and secure region.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> 2024-06-30T00:00:00+08:00 Copyright (c) 2025 https://sare.um.edu.my/index.php/IJCS/article/view/61782 Exporting Autocracy via BRI? Experiences from Southeast Asia 2025-06-04T15:50:25+08:00 Yung-Ming YEN yyen76@gmail.com <p>While most agree that China’s Belt and Road Initiative is an ambitious strategy to maximise its geopolitical position worldwide, policymakers and scholars have questioned whether the BRI implies an attempt to promote Beijing’s governance model. This article takes a political economy approach to analyse the domestic political dynamics of the recipient countries. Political elites tend to employ available incentives to consolidate their winning coalitions if their political survival is threatened. A regime under transition is vulnerable to external influence during political competition, and the “convenient” money from Beijing becomes an offer that the ruling elites of recipient states cannot decline. Consequently, such external influence indirectly undermines the regime dynamics of recipient states. The case studies of four Southeast Asian states — Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand — offer supportive evidence for this explanation.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> 2024-06-30T00:00:00+08:00 Copyright (c) 2025 https://sare.um.edu.my/index.php/IJCS/article/view/61783 Taiwan’s Image in Thai Civil Services: Impact of 2022 New Southbound Policy 2025-06-04T15:53:56+08:00 Pannavij TAMTAI pannavij@gmail.com <p>The New Southbound Policy (NSP) was the Taiwan’s government policy under the President Tsai Ing-wen administration. The policy aimed to closely engage Taiwan with 18 countries in ASEAN, South Asia, and Oceania. Thailand was one of the countries. This study surveyed the Thai civil services’ attitude of the nine related agencies toward Taiwan after the implementation of the policy in 2022. The sampling of the research was 120 Thai civil services of Knowledge Worker Position category (K category) of the nine related agencies to the NSP. The image of Taiwan was evaluated by 20 questions of seven indices which were visibility about Taiwan, description about Taiwan, preference for Taiwan, foreign relations with Thailand, policy evaluation on the New Southbound Policy, and policy recommendation. The questionnaire distribution and the survey operation followed the Thai government’s One-China Policy. The participant answers were personal opinions. The values of Taiwan perceived in Thailand from the reflection of the perception of the Thai civil service sample was in a positive way. Technological advancement was the most admired image of Taiwan. Travel and tourism aspect was the most successful aspect of the NSP implementation in Thailand. Tourism was emphasized as recommendations to help tighten relations between Thailand and Taiwan.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> 2024-06-30T00:00:00+08:00 Copyright (c) 2025