PENGHAKIMAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH MALAYSIA: ANALISIS KES-KES TERPILIH
Shariah Court Judgement in Malaysia: An Analysis of Selected Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22452/syariah.vol29no3.7Keywords:
Shariah Court Judgement, Shariah Case Report, Shariah Court, Shariah Judge, Administration of Shariah CourtAbstract
Article’s objective is to analyse decisions of the Shariah Courts in Malaysia from the perspective of case law reporting on its judgment with particular interest to observe the tendency, challenges and problems faced by these courts while delivering judgement. Analysis is made to cases reported in the Jurnal Hukum published by Department of Shariah Judiciary Malaysia (JKSM) and Syariah Law Reports published by LexisNexis in the year 2012 as sampling. From the cases analysed it was found that the Shariah judges are prepared to make orginal interpretation in matters relating to procedure but would rely normatively on the Islamic Shariah in substatantive matters, although the provisions of the law allow the court flexibility to be innovative. It is also found that the courts in the judgment include additional discussion to the main issue or question of the case which is probably not relevant. Shariah judges also follow and refer the decisions or interpretation of cases reported and this solidifies the position that Shariah Courts do practice the principle of binding precedent.
Downloads
References
Abdul Hamid Mohamed & Ahmad Ibrahim, ‘Nota Perbicaraan dan Penghakiman’, Jurnal Hukum IX(I) (1994): 1-10.
Abdul Monir Yaacob, ‘Pelaksanaan Perundangan Islam di Malaysia: Satu Penilaian’, Jurnal Fiqh 6 (2009):1-20.
Abdul Monir Yaacob, Perkembangan Pentadbiran Undang-undang Islam di Malaysia (Cyberjaya: Universiti Islam Malaysia, 2016).
Ahmad Hidayat Buang, ‘Reformasi Undang-undang Keluarga Islam’, Jurnal Syariah 5(1) (1997): 35-50.
Ahmad Hidayat Buang, Fatwa di Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Syariah an Undang-undang, UM, 2004).
Ahmad Hidayat Buang, ‘Penulisan Teks Penghakiman dalam Perundangan Islam’, dalam Ruzman Md. Noor (ed.), Penulisan Teks Penghakiman di Mahkamah Syariah (Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya, 2008).
Ahmad Ibrahim, Islamic Law in Malaya (Singapura: MRSI, 1975).
Ahmad Ibrahim, ‘Undang-undang Islam di Mahkamah Sivil. Jurnal Hukum X(I) (1995): 11-26.
Ahmad Ibrahim, ‘Kesesuaian Hukum Islam Dalam Pentadbiran di Malaysia’, Jurnal Hukum XII(II) (1998): 185-199.
Anderson, J.N.D., ‘Recent Developments in Sharia Law II (Matters of Competence, Organization and Procedure)’, The Moslem World 41(1) (1951): 34-48.
Anderson, J.N.D., Islamic Law in the Modern World (USA: New York University Press, 1959).
Esposito, John L. & De Long-Bas, Nathana J., Women in Muslim Family Law. 2nd edition (Syracuse University Press, 2001).
Faiza Thamby Chik, ‘Islamic Law in Civil Courts’, dalam Abdul Monir Yaacob (ed.). Sistem Kehakiman Islam (Kuala Lumpur: IKIM 2001).
Faiza Thamby Chik, ‘Perbandingan Kaedah Penulisan Teks Penghakiman’, dalam Ruzman Md. Noor (ed.), Penulisan Teks Penghakiman di Mahkamah Syariah (Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya, 2008).
Ghazali Abdul Rahman, ‘Perkembangan Terkini Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia’, dalam Abdul Monir Yaacob (ed.). Sistem Kehakiman Islam (Kuala Lumpur: IKIM, 2001).
Jamalludin Hashim, ‘Isu-isu Fiqh yang tidak Muktamad Menurut Mazhab Shafi’i dalam Kitab al-Sirat al-Mustaqim Karya Syakh Nur al-Din al-Raniri’, Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 5 (Keluaran Khas) (2011): 93-102.
James, Philip S., Introduction to English Law (London: Butterworth, 1996).
Maqdisi, John, ‘Legal Logic and Equity in Islamic Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 33(1) (1985): 63-92.
Mazni Abdul Wahab et.al., ‘Arahan Amalan: pelaksanaanya di Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia’, The Law Review 4 (2012): 579-599.
Muhammad Hashim Kamali, ‘Appelate Review and Judicial Independence in Islamic Law’, Islamic Studies 29(3) (1990): 215-249.
Mohammad Hashim Kamali, ‘Shari’ah and Civil Law: Towards a Methodology of Harmonization’, Islamic Law and Society 14(3) (2007): 392-420.
Peletz, J. Micheal, ‘Are Women Getting (More) Justice? Malaysia’s Sharia Courts in Etnographic and Historical Perspective’, Law and Society Review 52(3) (2018): 652-684.
Raja Azlan Shah, Judgments of HRH Sultan Azlan Shah: With Commentary. (compiled and edited by Visu Sinnadurai) (Kuala Lumpur : Professional (Law) Books Publishers, 1986).
Raihanah Abdullah, ‘Penulisan Teks Penghakiman Kes-Kes Kekeluargaan di Mahkamah Syariah’, dalam Ruzman Md. Noor (ed.), Penulisan Teks Penghakiman di Mahkamah Syariah (Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya, 2008).
Ruzman Mohd Nor (ed.), Penulisan Teks Penghakiman di Mahkamah Syariah (Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya, 2008).
Salleh Buang, ‘Penghukuman: Satu Panduan Ringkas Untuk Hakim Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia’, Jurnal Hukum VI(I) (1998): 49-70.
Salleh Buang, Malaysian Legal History: Cases and Materials (Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 2015).
Shapiro, Martin, ‘Islam and Appeal’, California Law Review, 68(2) (1980): 350-381.
Suwaid Tapah, ‘Penulisan Teks Penghakiman Kes-Kes Mal di Mahkamah Syariah’, dalam Ruzman Md. Noor (ed.), Penulisan Teks Penghakiman di Mahkamah Syariah (Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya, 2008).
Swedberg, Ricard, The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts (Stanford University Press California, 2005).
Williams, Glanville Llewelyn, Learning the Law (London: Steven & Sons, 1982).
Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar & Nurhidayah Muhd Hashim, Isu-isu Syariah di Malaysia Ke Arah Meletakkan Hak Kepada Yang Berhak (Shah Alam: Penerbit UiTM, 2008).
Kes
Abdul Nasir b. Mohd Tahir lwn Ketua Pendakwa Syarie (Kes Mal (Rayuan) No.14000-199-0040-2007 Mahkamah Rayuan Syariah Wilayah Persekutuan).
Ahmad @ Ahmad Zukni b. Johari lwn. Rosnah bt. Esahak [2009] 28/2 JH 163.
Hamzah Zainuddin lwn Noraini Abdul Rashid [2005] 1 CLJ (Sya) 96-99.
Majlis Agama Islam dan Adat Melayu Terengganu lwn Tengku Zainul Akmal bin Tengku Besar Mahmud dan Seorang Lagi [2012] 34/2 JH 191-212.
Mohd Idris b. Hj Masior lwn Ketua Pendakwa Syarie [2010] Mahkamah Rayuan Syariah Selangor (Kes Mal No.10000-012-0002-2009).
Muhammad Ridwan b. Tokiri & Seorang Lagi lwn Ketua Pendakwa Syarie [2012] 34/2 JH 213-228.
Pendakwa Syarie lwn Muhammad Fauzullah bin Ahmad Basheer [2012] 34/2 JH 273-286.
Re Kelthom bt Mohd Amin [2012] 1 ShLR 128-141.
Samsudin Md Husin lwn Ketua Pendakwa Syarie [2012] 34/2 JH 229-236.
Shamsul bin Abdul Kadir lwn Ketua Pendakwa Syarie [2012] 34/2 JH 237-245.
Sharifah Badariah bt Mari v. Yasran b. Haji Hussain [2012] 34/2 JH 247-272.
Siti Munauwarah binti Ahmad lwn. Muhammad Fauzan bin Hashim [2012] 34/2 JH 287-307.
Tauran bin Abdul Hamid v. Junaida bt Isa [2012] 1 ShLR 76-89.
Temu bual
Tuan Arik Sanusi Yeop Johari (Pengarah Bahagian Syariah, Pejabat Peguam Negara), dalam temu bual bersama beliau melalui Whatsapp pada 19 Februari 2019.
YAA Dato’ Dr. Mohd Naim Mokhtar (Ketua Hakim Syarie, Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia), dalam temu bual bersama beliau melalui Whatsapp pada 18 Februari 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved. Not allowed to be reproduced any part of articles and contents of this journal in any form or by any way, whether electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without permission in writing from the Chief Editor, Jurnal Syariah.
